Welcome to Shobeceo's World of Blogging
Notice to All who are Employed:
October 18th, 2008EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1, 2008
NEW OFFICE POLICY
Dress Code:
1) You are advised to come to work dressed according to your salary.
2) If we see you wearing Prada shoes and carrying a Gucci bag, we will assume you are doing well financially and therefore do not need a raise.
3) If you dress poorly, you need to learn to manage your money better, so that you may buy nicer clothes, and therefore you do not need a raise.
4) If you dress just right, you are right where you need to be and therefore you do not need a raise.
BAR EXAMINATION 2008: REMEDIAL LAW
October 1st, 2008
|
||
| 28 September 2008 | 8 A.M. - 12 NN. | |
|
INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire consists of twenty-one (21) questions contained in eight (8) pages. Read each question very carefully. Answer legibly, clearly and concisely. Start each number on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and on the immediately succeeding pages until completed. Do not repeat the question. You will be given credit for your knowledge of legal doctrine and for the quality of your legal reasoning. A mere “Yes” or “No” answer without any corresponding discussion will not be given any credit. HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. GOOD LUCK!!! |
||
| Signed DANTE O. TINGA Chairperson 2008 Bar Examination Committee |
||
|
|
||
What say you ATENISTA???
September 30th, 2008Got this link from a friend…seems the La Sallian brothers can’t accept their recent fall with the UAAP Championship! What say you ATENISTA???
(Got this from Marion, Which he got from Thirdy. Copy Pasted 
)
Gloating Blue Eagle -Talking Points
By Bobby Cabral
Dear La Sallians:
By now, you would have experienced gale force winds in Katipunan. Or you would have read articles in newspapers or blogs proclaiming the greatness of this season 71 edition of the Blue Eagles, Rabeh, Chris Tiu, Buenafe et al. They will also criticize our Archers as pikon and lacking class for not receiving their runner-up trophy, so perhaps we should be prepared with the facts.
1. While UP is the host of Season 71 and they selected the Narvasa Brothers (both former Blue Eagle varsity players) and were directly responsible for the referees.
2. Commissioner Chito Narvasa penalized La Salle and Coach Franz Pumaren during the first La Salle-Ateneo regular season game for not wearing his ID and gave two free throws to Ateneo. This inspite of Coach Pido Jarencio of UST being shown not wearing his ID during the earlier game and not being penalized.
3. During two regular games during the season, one versus FEU and the other against UST, referees who called technical fouls against La Salle’s opponents were punished by Narvasa after the game with a termination and one with a suspension.
4. During the the final championship game, Buenafe, Jobe and other Ateneans could be seen taunting and trash talking but were not penalized.
5. The referees called 29 fouls on the Archers and only 13 fouls against the Blue Eagles. They awarded 28 free throws (18 which were converted) to Ateneo and only 8 free throws to the Green Archers.
6. The phantom finger of Rico was not clearly evident and since there was no reaction from the Eagles, it must not have happened.
7. The Green Archers were in the dugout during the awarding and no official from the UAAP called them out to receive their award.
Finally, if the Ateneans wanted to win with honor, they failed to do so. The Ateneo community should have asked the Narvasas to inhibit themselves due to their school history and obvious bias towards La Salle.
I will concede the first three La Salle-Ateneo games in Season 71 to the Blue Eagles. But we will never know the outcome of game 2 of the Championship series.because the referees panicked when La Salle reduced a 15 point deficit to three in less than five minutes.
Animo La Salle!!!
BAR EXAMINATION 2008: MERCANTILE LAW
September 23rd, 2008
|
||
| 21 September 2008 | 8:00 A.M. - 12 Noon | |
|
INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire consists of fourteen (19) numbers contained in nine (9) pages. Read each question very carefully. Answer legibly, clearly and concisely. Start each number on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and on the immediately succeeding pages until completed. Do not repeat the question. You will be given credit for your knowledge of legal doctrine and for the quality of your legal reasoning. A mere “Yes” or “No” answer without any corresponding discussion will not be given any credit. HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE GOOD LUCK!!! |
||
| Signed DANTE O. TINGA Chairperson 2008 Bar Examination Committee |
||
|
|
||
BAR EXAMINATION 2008: CRIMINAL LAW
September 23rd, 2008
|
||
| 21 September 2008 | 2:00 P.M. - 5 P.M. | |
|
INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire consist of fifteen (15) questions contained in six (6) pages. Read each question very carefully. Answer legibly, clearly and concisely. Start each number on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and on the immediately succeeding pages until completed. Do not repeat the question. You will be given credit for your knowledge of legal doctrine and for the quality of your legal reasoning. A mere ” Yes” or “No” answer without any corresponding discussion will not be given credit. HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE GOOD LUCK!!! |
||
| Signed DANTE O. TINGA Chairperson 2008 Bar Examination Committee |
||
|
|
||
BAR EXAMINATION 2008: CIVIL LAW
September 18th, 2008Mostly questions on Family Law. Property questions include possession, good faith, prescription, hidden treasure, accretion, and riparian property. There’s about three questions on Obligations and Contracts; the rest are on Wills and Succession.
|
||
| 14 September 2008 | 8 A.M. - 12 Noon | |
|
INSTRUCTIONS This questionnaire consists of nineteen (19) questions contained in twelve (12) pages. Read each question very carefully. Answer legibly, clearly and concisely. Start each number on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and on the immediately succeeding pages until completed. Do not repeat the question. You will be given credit for your knowledge of legal doctrine and for the quality of your legal reasoning. A mere “Yes” or “No” answer without any corresponding discussion will not be given any credit. HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE. GOOD LUCK!!! |
||
| Signed DANTE O. TINGA Chairperson 2008 Bar Examination Committee |
||
Herrera vs. Luy Kim Guan
September 16th, 2008G.R. No. L-17043 January 31, 1961
NATIVIDAD HERRERA, assisted by her husband EMIGDIO SALAZAR, plaintiffs-appellants,
vs.
LUY KIM GUAN and LINO BANGAYAN, defendants-appellees.
T. de los Santos for plaintiffs-appellants.
Rafael C. Climaco and Abelardo S. Fernandez for defendants-appellees.
BARRERA, J.:
This is an appeal from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga City (a) dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s complaint for the recovery of three (3) parcels of land and their produce in the sum of P320,000.00; and (b) instead, sentencing plaintiff to pay P2,000.00 for attorney’s fees and P1,000.00 for expenses of litigation, to defendant Lino Bangayan, and P2,000.00 as attorney’s fees and P500.00 as expenses of litigation, to the other defendant Luy Kim Guan.
The pertinent facts as found by the trial court and upon which its decision was predicated are set forth in the following portion of the decision appealed from:
The Plaintiff Natividad Herrera is the legitimate daughter of Luis Herrera, now deceased and who died in China sometime after he went to that country in the last part of 1931 or early part of 1932. The said Luis Herrera in his lifetime was the owner of three (3) parcels of land and their improvements, known as Lots 1740, 4465 and 4467 of Expediente No. 5, G.L.R.O. Record 477 and the area, nature, improvements and bound of each and every of these three (3) lots are sufficiently described in the complaint filed by the plaintiffs.
A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC
September 4th, 2008 ShobeceoRE: PROPOSED RULE ON GUIDELINES TO BE OBSERVED BY TRIAL COURT JUDGES AND CLERKS OF COURT IN THE CONDUCT OF PRE- TRIAL AND USE OF DEPOSITION-DISCOVERY MEASURES RESOLUTION
The use of pre-trial and the deposition-discovery measures are undeniably important and vital components of case management in trial courts. To decongest court dockets, and to further implementthe pre-trial guidelines laid down in Administrative Circular No. 3-99 dated January 15, 1999 and except as otherwise specifically provided for in other special rules, the following guidelines are issued for the observance and guidance of trial judges and clerks of court: decongest court dockets, and to further implement the pre-trial guidelines laid down in Administrative Circular No. 3-99 dated January 15, 1999 and except as otherwise specifically provided for in other special rules, the following guidelines are issued for the observance and guidance of trial judges and clerks of court: (more…)
Last 2 puppies left….so get ur baby now!
August 25th, 2008
Boy: Errol
Girl: Ebony
YEZ…last two (out of six) babies left….Errol and Ebony has PCCI Papers (with 16 red marks and 4 green marks) and Medical records (6 dewormings and 4 5-in-1 vaccine shots included)
Birthdate: May 10, 2008 (3 months old now
Breed: Pure breed Shih Tzu (princess-type)
To buy, contact Christine @ 09174216701 or 09228637883
| Previous Posts | Next Posts |
